Nah. I always say what I mean and rarely stumble. :)Shall we ask your ex her opinion on that? <GG>
Ha! This is one on which she would not disagree with me, I think. :)
Haven't you yet learned that an "ex" always disagrees with you, unless GH>agreeing with you is to their advantage <G>
Nah. I always say what I mean and rarely stumble. :)Shall we ask your ex her opinion on that? <GG>
Ha! This is one on which she would not disagree with me, I think. :)
Haven't you yet learned that an "ex" always disagrees with you, unless agreeing with you is to their advantage <G>
Ex's also have what I call "reverse thermostats." That is, whatever temperature I "was" at the time, she would be the exact opposite. If I were freezing, she'd be burning up. If I were burning up, she'd be freezing. <G>
were freezing, she'd be burning up. If I were burning up, she'd be GH>CM> freezing. <G>
I wouldn't know... no matter what, my ex was always freezing <GG>
Haven't you yet learned that an "ex" always disagrees with you, unless agreeing with you is to their advantage <G>
She'd agree with me. But she would see it as a negative where I see it
as a positive. As in "he's too blunt" versus "you always know where
you stand with me."
I wouldn't know... no matter what, my ex was always freezing <GG>
I think we're talking about two entirely different subjects, here. At least, I'm not talking about the same kind of freezing *you're* talking about. Although..... <G>
unlessHaven't you yet learned that an "ex" always disagrees with you,
itagreeing with you is to their advantage <G>
She'd agree with me. But she would see it as a negative where I see
as a positive. As in "he's too blunt" versus "you always know where you stand with me."
IOW, she would actually disagree with you, because she would not see it
as a positive thing. <G>
Gregg in Kitchener, ON on 03/16/2010 at 09:23
Gregg in Kitchener, ON on 03/16/2010 at 09:23
Potatoes, potatoes.
itIOW, she would actually disagree with you, because she would not see
as a positive thing. <G>
Potatoes, potatoes.
(Uh, you have to insert your own vowel sounds in that last sentence in order for it to make any sense.)
(Leave it alone) :)
Gregg in Kitchener, ON on 03/16/2010 at 09:23
Potatoes, potatoes.
Potaaaaytoes, potahtoes. <G>
see itIOW, she would actually disagree with you, because she would not
as a positive thing. <G>
Potatoes, potatoes.
Don't you mean... potatoes, potahtoes? <GG>
Potaaaaytoes, potahtoes. <G>
...let's call the whole thing off...... *dum de dum* :)
Where are your musical notes? <G>
Potatoes, potatoes.
Don't you mean... potatoes, potahtoes? <GG>
Well, yes and no. :)
Potatoes, potatoes.
Don't you mean... potatoes, potahtoes? <GG>
Well, yes and no. :)
Typical government employee... come on now, commit yourself! Which is
it? Yes, or no? <GG>
I believe you meant to say "unintuitive", right? <G>
Nah. I always say what I mean and rarely stumble. :)
Shall we ask your ex her opinion on that? <GG>
IOW, there is no reason whatsoever for me to upgrade to 2007 (or 2010) from 2003...
I suppose not. Especially if you don't like intuitive interfaces. :D
2010)IOW, there is no reason whatsoever for me to upgrade to 2007 (or
from 2003...
I suppose not. Especially if you don't like intuitive interfaces. :D
I believe you meant to say "unintuitive", right? <G>
I believe you meant to say "unintuitive", right? <G>
Nah. I always say what I mean and rarely stumble. :)
| Sysop: | Martin J Mitchell |
|---|---|
| Location: | Scotland |
| Users: | 5 |
| Nodes: | 10 (0 / 10) |
| Uptime: | 26:19:00 |
| Calls: | 127 |
| Files: | 29,254 |
| Messages: | 54,760 |