Thppppfffffppppphhhttttt! <G>
I see your macro is working overtime!
thingbelieve the law says that if that is what I want, they can't do a
about it, so I make sure they know that is what I want.
Oh cool! It's a *law*??? Excellent.
itWhen I upgraded beginning of the month, the fellow took a look at my plan, and began laughing. He then asked me what it felt like to stick
to Rogers that way <GG>
Nice that he has such a good sense of humour. He should quit there and come work for the government. :D
Which still points toward you. I've seen your photo, remember?
No... you have seen a photo purporting to be me... <GG>
True. And I've seen you face to face. (heh. Thought you were going
to get away with it, huh?) :D :D
Thppppfffffppppphhhttttt! <G>I see your macro is working overtime!
The worst part... Doug now has that same macro and knows how to
use it, which makes him dangerous <GG>
The worst part... Doug now has that same macro and knows how to
use it, which makes him dangerous <GG>
I wa thinking it made him more of a copy-cat.
Have you been taking lessons in government double-speak from
Doug? <GG>
I can neither confirm not deny that allegation, however the appearance
of the reality may or may not indicate the possibility of the
correctness or incorrectness of the interpretation of the results of
your inquiry.
Thppppfffffppppphhhttttt! <G>
I see your macro is working overtime!
The worst part... Doug now has that same macro and knows how to use it, which makes him dangerous <GG>
myWhen I upgraded beginning of the month, the fellow took a look at
stick itplan, and began laughing. He then asked me what it felt like to
andto Rogers that way <GG>
Nice that he has such a good sense of humour. He should quit there
come work for the government. :D
But if he did, he would only be able to use it behind the scenes, as we
all know that anyone who works for the government has absolutely no
sense of humour when they are dealing with one of "us". <GG>
Which still points toward you. I've seen your photo, remember?
No... you have seen a photo purporting to be me... <GG>
True. And I've seen you face to face. (heh. Thought you were going to get away with it, huh?) :D :D
Excuse me, but you have seen "face to face" someone purporting to be
me. Did you ask for positive identification? (And you thought you were going to stick it to me, huh? <GG>)
andProbably nothing as the on was in the other message, without an off,
anthe off was in this message, without an on to act upon. So we have
didn'ton without an off, and off without an on, or, said another way, the original change anticipated didn't occur, and the desired change
have anything to change.
Have you been taking lessons in government double-speak from
Doug? <GG>
I can neither confirm not deny that allegation, however the appearance
of the reality may or may not indicate the possibility of the
correctness or incorrectness of the interpretation of the results of
your inquiry.
thatThe worst part... Doug now has that same macro and knows how to
use it, which makes him dangerous <GG>
I wa thinking it made him more of a copy-cat.
I suppose it does, but being a civil servant, I really can't expect him
to think for himself. As a result, his being a copycat didn't even
cross my mind (and this response likely gives him an opportunity to use
macro, too <GG>)
The worst part... Doug now has that same macro and knows how toI wa thinking it made him more of a copy-cat.
use it, which makes him dangerous <GG>
I suppose it does, but being a civil servant, I really can't
expect him to think for himself. As a result, his being a copycat
didn't even cross my mind (and this response likely gives him an opportunity to use that macro, too <GG>)
nProbably nothing as the on was in the other message, without an off,
the off was in this message, without an on to act upon. So we have
idn'on without an off, and off without an on, or, said another way, the original change anticipated didn't occur, and the desired change
have anything to change.I can neither confirm not deny that allegation, however the appearance
Have you been taking lessons in government double-speak from
Doug? <GG>
of the reality may or may not indicate the possibility of the
correctness or incorrectness of the interpretation of the results of
your inquiry.
And that goes double for me!
Excuse me, but you have seen "face to face" someone purporting to be me. Did you ask for positive identification? (And you thought you were going to stick it to me, huh? <GG>)
You forget I work for the government Gregg.
expect him to think for himself. As a result, his being a copycat didn't even cross my mind (and this response likely gives him an opportunity to use that macro, too <GG>)
Probably so: after all, it is Powless, not Powmore!
it,The worst part... Doug now has that same macro and knows how to use
which makes him dangerous <GG>
Thppppfffffppppphhhttttt!
Whoops. I meant to say "what were you saying?"
all know that anyone who works for the government has absolutely no sense of humour when they are dealing with one of "us". <GG>
Sure we do! We laugh all the time at you guys. We're just very very
adept at keeping a straight face and acting all serious-like when you
come to us for assistance.
It's an art.
When you install that, it will find your older Avast! version and offer to remove it for you before it installs itself... a manual update of 4.8 to 5.0 <G>Well that sounds like a lot of work! <ggg>
Huh? How a lot of work? Download the file (not hard) then double
click on it. From there, it can all be automatic. Not hard work
at all...
time. OTOH I did have some spray paint. No, wasn't 'tagging'! The grills for the a/c and heating vents were looking bad so took them down, washed them, and spray painted.
So you already had the varnish... it didn't cost you anything to
use it on the rock <GG>
And it is now serving a more useful purpose than mine is <GG>Right now your's might be serving a more useful purpose: mine is under a foot or so of snow.
It is holding up the snow, isn't it? Then it has a useful purpose
Huh? How a lot of work? Download the file (not hard) then double
click on it. From there, it can all be automatic. Not hard work
at all...
<whiney mode on>
But I have to move the mouse allllll the way up to the Firefox icon,
click on that, then type in the site name..... <g>
Oops! Almost forgot to turn whiney mode off!
</whiney mode>
Whomever she found in Louisiana to give her advice on the divorce and
all associated legal matters, suggested she try to apply for what the
IRS calls "injured spouse" status. Basically, "injured spouse" means "I
She tried.
She applied.
The IRS denied.
<GRIN>
OK... you are entitled and allowed <GG>
It reduced my outstanding tax debt by about $600. <G>
Huh? How a lot of work? Download the file (not hard) then double<whiney mode on>
click on it. From there, it can all be automatic. Not hard work
at all...
But I have to move the mouse allllll the way up to the Firefox icon,
click on that, then type in the site name..... <g>
Thppppfffffppppphhhttttt! <G>
ifMy plan is no where as great as yours but it's still a lot better than what they're currently offering to new subscribers. I'll have to remember that when upgrading my iPhone in the summer.
Before I upgrade a phone, I always check the current plans being
offered, and compare them to what I have. If the new things don't compare,
they are worse (and they always are), I simply renew what I have. I
believe the law says that if that is what I want, they can't do a thing about it, so I make sure they know that is what I want.
When I upgraded beginning of the month, the fellow took a look at my
plan, and began laughing. He then asked me what it felt like to stick it
to Rogers that way <GG>
Carroll....like
What matters is not who is closer to his age, but who LOOKS more
the older one <GG>
Which still points toward you. I've seen your photo, remember?
No... you have seen a photo purporting to be me... <GG>
GREGG HOMMEL wrote to CARROLL MCALLISTER <=-
Just like the "Easy Button" they sell. I can't imagine why anyone would want to spend their hard-earned money for such a silly item, but then people spent their hard earned money on pet rocks years ago. <G>
HEY! Watch it! My pet rock is sitting over there on my bookshelf
behaving himself quietly and not hurting anyone, and you have to
go insulting him? Shame on you!
Fascinating! I've never heard of a divorce happening without a legal separation preceding. If by, uncontested you mean *truly* uncontested - where there are no papers drawn up to indicate a division of assets, then that's even more interesting.
Yeah! I also had a 'pet rock' but it wasn't the official Pet Rock:
found a double-fist-sized rock that looked neat. Must have found it
when it was wet as spray varished it to keep that shiny/glistening look.
...Not sure where it is now -- might be outside in one of the rock. gardens.
Don't worry... you would never be confused with Mr. Martin. You might GH>be mistaken for his (much) older brother, or perhaps his father, but GH>never for him <GG>
That would be a neat trick, since he's closer to your age than he is
mine. <G>
Right now, I get 450 "anytime" minutes, unlimited evening and weekend minutes, plus unlimited mobile-to-mobile if the other subscriber is an
AT&T subscriber. Plus, the unused "anytime" minutes get rolled over.
Right now, I have a couple thousand "rollover" minutes. And that costs
me about $45, plus another $15 for "unlimited web access" on the phone.
Don't worry... you would never be confused with Mr. Martin. You might
be mistaken for his (much) older brother, or perhaps his father, but GH>never for him <GG>
Another difference between our countries... here, moving cable or GH>satellite isn't that costly... or is free (as in the case of cable, and GH>sometimes, satellite)
payment (I get 700 weekday minutes, and unlimited evenings andweekends, for $45), and if I "renew" it, I get it for another three
Neither do, so I keep a select few to remind me... not that it seems to GH>do any good <GG>
I vote for him doing something about it. I surely don't want to
be confused with Mr. Martin. <G>
Was that 'with' or 'by'??!!
To get my new phone at a cost of $9.99, I had to renew my "plan" with Rogers for three years. I didn't mind... my plan is an old one they discontinued about six years ago, because it gave too much for too little payment (I get 700 weekday minutes, and unlimited evenings and weekends, for $45), and if I "renew" it, I get it for another three years, and they can't try to get me to change to a more expensive plan with lessmind
minutes. I've had that same plan for almost 10 years now, so why would I
renewing it for another 3 years? <GG>
Doug....-
Fascinating! I've never heard of a divorce happening without a legal separation preceding. If by, uncontested you mean *truly* uncontested
thenwhere there are no papers drawn up to indicate a division of assets,
divorcethat's even more interesting.
Define "legal separation"... according to the law (or so I have been
told), living apart for more than a year due to a breakdown of the
marriage is a "legal separation" and all that is required to initiate
proceedings. There is no need to consult a lawyer and draw up any form of paper if the two parties have agreed to the "terms".
As for "uncontested", this means that whatever terms or conditions are included in the divorce papers by the initiating party are acceptable as they stand by the other party and they will not contest the divorce inas
the courts. In my case, I will be glad to divide the assets evenly
provided she also accepts 1/2 the debt incurred in acquiring those assets,
they both existed on the date of breakdown of the marriage (the day she walked out). If she does (and has, as her lawyer cousin informed herThere
the courts would insist on this <G>), then the stuff she took with her
when she left is in excess of her net half <G>
AAMOF, this kind of divorce (uncontested) can even be done without a lawyer. I believe you can purchase a "kit" of the required forms and
filing information, complete them, and in effect, be your own lawyer.
is a court fee (or fees) but no legal costs...
What matters is not who is closer to his age, but who LOOKS more like
the older one <GG>
I don't need "rollover" minutes. I rarely ever use my full 700 weekday
the courts. In my case, I will be glad to divide the assets evenly GH>provided she also accepts 1/2 the debt incurred in acquiring those assets, as
they both existed on the date of breakdown of the marriage (the day she
When you install that, it will find your older Avast! version and
offer to remove it for you before it installs itself... a manual
update of 4.8 to 5.0 <G>
Well that sounds like a lot of work! <ggg>
My plan is no where as great as yours but it's still a lot better than
what they're currently offering to new subscribers. I'll have to
remember that when upgrading my iPhone in the summer.
We should talk more about this sometime Gregg. Offline of course.
Must have been my southern New Hampshire drawl!! <g>Well, I've had it for a bit over a half-century so it is slightly ingarined but I'll see what I can do....
That's it! Can you do something about it, or must I continue to
rfer to you as above? <GG>
Please, if you don't mind. All in the interests of better
understanding, mind....
I'm still at 4.8. Trying the manual update option.... "Program:
Already up to date". Maybe your 5.x is the Canadian version! <g>
Wrong manual update option. the one I referrred to is where you
go to their web site and download a complete Avast! v.5.0 file.
When you install that, it will find your older Avast! version and
offer to remove it for you before it installs itself... a manual
update of 4.8 to 5.0 <G>
Yeah! I also had a 'pet rock' but it wasn't the official Pet Rock:
found a double-fist-sized rock that looked neat. Must have found it
when it was wet as spray varished it to keep that shiny/glistening look.
At least your pet rock didn't cost you hard earned monies <GG>
...Not sure where it is now -- might be outside in one of the rock. gardens.
And it is now serving a more useful purpose than mine is <GG>
What matters is not who is closer to his age, but who LOOKS more like GH>the older one <GG>
Which still points toward you. I've seen your photo, remember?
That bugged my brother, for some reason. <G>
With keeping family members updated on his status, particularly that
first night in the emergency room, I went over my minute allotment by
about 200 minutes or so, to the tune of a couple of hundred dollars in
Service, so I went ahead and took that out. I knew it wouldn't matter, because the IRS was going to go after both parties for the outstanding
tax debt, no matter what a little thing like a divorce decree said.
And, as I already related once before, it did. Bwahahahahahahah!!!!
time. OTOH I did have some spray paint. No, wasn't 'tagging'! The
grills for the a/c and heating vents were looking bad so took them down, washed them, and spray painted.
And it is now serving a more useful purpose than mine is <GG>
Right now your's might be serving a more useful purpose: mine is under a foot or so of snow.
No kidding! From what I understand, the IRS will go after anyone, GH>anytime, under any situation, irregardless of any court orders telling them GH>not to <GG>
And, as I already related once before, it did. Bwahahahahahahah!!!!
OK... you are entitled nd allowed <GG>
| Sysop: | Martin J Mitchell |
|---|---|
| Location: | Scotland |
| Users: | 5 |
| Nodes: | 10 (0 / 10) |
| Uptime: | 25:09:15 |
| Calls: | 127 |
| Files: | 29,254 |
| Messages: | 54,760 |